About Me

Name: Sara Shores
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

BAKER & the DILETTANTES: OK, just put Saddam back, ok?

Posted by Sara Shores on Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:57:59 PM
 

 

BAKER & the DILETTANTES: OK, just put Saddam back, ok?



Sara Concedes: (even more now after the DILETTANTE COMMITTEE REPORT,) The only possible solution to Iraq..PUT SADDAM BACK ALREADY. AND...WE THINK OUR /GANG OF 6 /IS JUST AS CAPABLE OF PUTTING TOGETHER A REPORT. So here is our opinion:

HANNAH THE WISE: OK, WE PREDICTED THAT the DEMS and libs AND GET ALONGS would do their thing.. just "talk" to Iran, just "talk" to Syria, just "talk" to Osama, just "talk" to the Palestinians. Ask them nicely to "sto-op".
MR.BAKER ET AL: WE NEED THE BASES IN IRAQ. !!! You guys never NOTICED that one of our reasons for our Iraq venture, is/was.. we need a MILITARY base there, in the Middle East,...... where hopefully, we can reach, militarily, these countries sponsering Islamic terriorists. This is our main deterrent. If you "dils" had just LOOKED AT A MAP of the middle east, or glanced downward, when you flew over to the GREEN ZONE, then VOILA! An observation? . WOW! duh!

MELINDA THE SIMPLE: I don't get the "talk" thing. MTV, PORNO, ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALITY, feminism, Israel! And you guys really think that if we point out to Syria and Iran that they are not "helping " stability in the region, that ..they will STOP their funding of the death of our troops? ACKHHH!??? These items will NEVER be on a compromise " table" with Muslims. Reminder: The major stumbling block is WE are not MUSLIM... YOU DREAMY LIBS DON'T HAVE A CLUE as to WHAT THE PROBLEM IS. THe Muslims TELL YOU, ALL THE TIME. Take them at their word. What is so hard? Stop talking. YOU DON'T LEARN WHEN YOUR MOUTH IS OPEN!! BLOWHARDS!!

JERRY THE MATHEMATICIAN: We needed to go to war after 911. THE AMERICAN PSCHE NEEDED TO FIGHT. And, gee, remember all those U.N. Sanctions? 12 years worth? What was that all about? Anyone remember the "no fly zone"? Why was that necessary? WHY DID IT DRAG ON FOR 12 YEARS??...... NO consequences!!....Just like this Baker diletante report: "Recommendations, sanctions, talk," and no possible deterrents when the suggestions fail!! How about telling Syria,.." Ok, next time we confiscate a Syrian national with a Syrian weapon in Iraq," Syria, you LOSE an airport!!!", and take it out.. .. Before we hand Iran a NUCLEAR weapon to soften their attitude of Hatred , and hail the coming of the last Mahdi.

LYNN THE DEVIOUS:-Saddam COULD CONTROL IRAQ ! AND we can't!..can't? Can't win.??.well, when we try to win, dealing with the maniac zealots, (who love death more than their children, who have a blood thirst for Muslims AND non-Muslims,) when we try, we get NON- VIOLENCE committee investigations.., we get Amnesty Int'l..saying, no panties on head for these poor- mistreated - head chopping- off, terrorists..The humane, non uniformed terrorists don't t follow the GENEVA rules, but we have to be" better". WE won ww2 by VIOLENCE. We actually bombed buildings that may have had women and children in them!! WAR is violent. WHEN WE ENTERED IRAQ, we tried not to destroy the infra structure, so the civilians would have some quality of life...Unlike Kosovo. BUT this probably was wrong, and as usual , from the people who don't respect life, Islam took it as a sign of weakness. Sadly.

PORTIA THE PHD: (she was in school with hillary) War is never right.How soon will we be sending troops to Darfur?

Sara concludes, Put Saddam back in. The BAKER REPORT has no mention of winning this war! History has no examples of winning a war WITHOUT a winner... This country will not want to fight until there is another attack. President Bush's ability to keep us safe, will prove to be our undoing, as it has fueled our complacency. We feel safe now. It is a delusion. Sara is not confused about this.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NANCY, OK, just put Saddam back, ok?

Posted by Sara Shores on Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:08:35 PM
 

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

NANCY, OK, just put Saddam back, ok?

NANCY, OK, just put Saddam back, ok?

Sara now CONCEDES that the only possible solution to Iraq..PUT HIM BACK ALREADY. If you believe:
#1-we should never have gone to Iraq. Nothing good has occurred there.
#2-Iraqis were better off under Saddam. Day care centers and stuff .Life was good. No torture rooms. None.
#3-Saddam was just an agrarian reformer. NO WMDS. None. Remember those gas masks in the bunkers?hmmm.,THEN ... PUT HIM BACK. To heck with the Kurds... and the gang adds more reasons:

HANNAH THE WISE: WITHOUT Saddam in charge, the DEMS and libs will do their thing..just "talk" to Iran, just "talk" to Syria, just "talk" to Osama, just "talk" to the Palestinians. Ask them nicely to "stoooop". Since muslims are encouraged to lie to non-muslims,( look at the Taqqiyah..authorized in the HADITH.) so, then, it makes perfect sense to just "talk". Show them what nice people we are? That worked for Clinton and Arafat. It worked for Carter and Korea. It worked for 18 U.N sanctions against Saddam over 10 years. Food for oil program worked with all these honorable people!
  God knows what the DEMS will give away this time . Probably Israel and a bunch of nuclear weapons to these crazies.

MELINDA THE SIMPLE: I don't get the "talk" thing. MTV, PORNO, ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALITY, feminism, will NEVER be on the "let's talk" table with Muslims. The major stumbling block is WE ARE NOT MUSLIM. YOU DREAMY  LIBS DON'T HAVE A CLUE WHAT THE PROBLEM IS. Muslims  TELL YOU, ALL THE TIME. ...Dr. Laura where are you?

JERRY THE MATHEMATICIAN : #4- WE HAVE FAILED IN IRAQ!!  We have lost almost 3000 of our troops since 2003. Libs equate that with 68,000 deaths in Viet Nam. .(libs can't do math, but can run the country? ) We lose 1300 college kids a year in alcohol related deaths, not counting auto deaths. We should close colleges.? 47,200 motor vehicle deaths in one year, 2005 ----Are we banning cars? Saddam makes more sense than the Dems. They want to talk, while the Muslims want to chop off heads. MIND-BOGGLING!

LYNN THE DEVIOUS:#5-Saddam COULD CONTROL IRAQ !AND we can't!!.These people are not ready for democracy!!. ( so , then, what's to talk, put saddam BACK) Saddam's killing and torture WAS controlled-- blood thirst, he killed mostly Shia, and he and his sons had great killing fields going, but they were quiet about it, and 300,000+ muslims dead,,and NO American deaths. He KEPT EMPLOYMENT HIGH..BUILDING LOTS OF CASTLES and.. day care centers, AND NO COMPLAINTS FROM THE TAXPAYERS...ALL THOSE NUCLEAR PHYSICISTS IN THE COUNTRY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH  wmds..NO.

PORTIA THE PHD: (she was in school with hillary) War is never right. How soon will we be sending troops to Darfur?

Sara can't wait for Nancy to put Saddam back in, to make Keith Ellison, our first Muslim congressman, chair of the Homeland Security committee, (out with that Muslim profiling at airports) and let those "Talks" and investigations begin!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NANCY, CLOSE DOWN WAL-MART? DEMOCRAT Unions VS DEMOCRAT Poor?

Posted by Sara Shores on Saturday, November 25, 2006 2:48:45 PM
 NANCY, CLOSE DOWN WAL-MART? DEMOCRAT Unions VS DEMOCRAT Poor?


 Sara is confused again: The Democrat ruling class has been after Wal-mart. You know, that big corporation that employs thousands of unskilled workers? It offers entry level opportunity to new workers, part time work for single mothers or students, supplemental income to seniors on social security, and allows a working family to get a little extra income while enabling moms to spend important hours in the home...So ,they don't pay wages equivalent to journeyman plumbers? So, why are the democrats so angry with WAL-MART?? The gang discusses this:

HANNAH THE WISE: WAL-MART's big sin is:  it is not Union...Duh!  UNIONS elect Democrats,  the largest donors to Democrats are UNIONS-- so Democrats are an arm of the unions,  libs are religious Democrats...see?
Let's think about what benefits Wal-mart's closing would bring to the non-privileged, who are Wal-mart's main employees. Would the unions be able to offer these basically unskilled workers nice jobs at nice union wages? ....Oh, ..say, at Boeing, the Auto manufacturers, the motion picture studios, the Teachers unions, the newspaper editorial rooms?., Are there enough jobs at the post office or in other civil service employment areas? If so, why don't the unions contact these low level (wal-mart etc) employees and offer them these great union jobs that are lying around unfilled?...( Instead of trying to unionize jobs that lead nowhere, these "unskilled jobs" ,the cart pushers, door greeters, shelf stockers, baggers, etc..)
    If Wal-mart trains them, they may develope skills that enable them to move UP into your union aristocracy.!

SUZY THE Sanguine: If unions/dems succeed in closing Wal-mart, or making it too expensive,.. who are the big losers??? The underprivledged , (mostly DEMOCRAT voters, since we know from recent election rhetoric that NO republicans are poor!)..they are also the main Wal-mart shoppers. These people can buy shoes now for their whole family for the price of ONE pair of shoes at Macy's? Has anyone of these privileged LIBS ever shopped Wal-mart? Go take a look!! (Well, we did hear that John Edwards , former senator, sent his lackey to Wal-mart for a play station, and was way too important to stand in lines like the rest of the hoi-poloi.We have also heard of unions buying party supplies and stationery supplies,etc at Wal-mart,shhhhh.)

JERRY THE MATHEMATICIAN: When Wal-mart was readying 3 new stores in Louisiana, in poor neighborhoods, they received over 33,000 job applications. They rec'd 25,000.applications for 325 positions for the new Evergreen Park store. So, are we saying that Wal-mart is taking reluctant SLAVE labor for their work force? And where they have opened in malls, lately, WSJ reports, they are now considered an ANCHOR store! Over-all sales at the other mall shops increased 24% to 33%! So Wal-mart is good for the nearby businesses as well!!
At a time when Libs support "taking" of properties to improve tax revenues, you'd think the huge sales taxes that pour into communities, plus new jobs, would attract you liberals....IF you really cared about the poor.

MELINDA THE SIMPLE: I HEARD THE LIBS HATED WAL-MART FOR IMPORTING FROM CHINA, BUT TARGET and COSTCO (approved by the libs) have to buy their merchandise in China ALSO..Expensive boutique stores buy their shoes abroad, and most garmnents and fabrics, and majority of their assembly take place abroad. NIKES are not made here. hmmmm. Environmental rules have driven furniture and much manufacturing to other countries who feed their people first, while igmoring pollution. Don't we like seeing poor people in other countries eating? . Everybody sells and buys China, Japan, Korea, etc.. Do you have a tv? Well!

PORTIA THE PHD: (She was in school with hillary) I would never shop at Wal-mart. NO valet parking! None!!

So Sara thinks the hypocrisy here ---with DEMS being for the poor only on election days ---is pretty sad. The DEMOCRAT Unions vs the DEMOCRAT POOR!! Democrat against Democrat. Sigh.

sara shores
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Draft? Begin with the RICH ,and EDUCATED? Ivy league, here we come!!

Posted by Sara Shores on Monday, November 20, 2006 1:18:52 PM
Draft? Begin with the RICH ,and EDUCATED? Ivy league, here we come!!

Sara is confused again. The 4 year-ongoing rant by Rep.Rangel that we must have a draft, coupled with the Sen.Kerry depiction of the troops as pitiful rejects, make Sara feel she has mis-understood the current role of our military., so-- the gang chimes in!!

HANNAH THE WISE: BRING ON THE DRAFT!! The new draft needs new rules .We must draft men AND women ,each must have minimum college education of 3 years, with preferences given to the available-age children of Senators and Congressmen.. I believe Chelsea Clinton could get through general's school in the Required 6 week Marine boot-camp. The smartest families in the country would supply our military bodies, and particularly the Ivy League Colleges, and the liberal arts schools, wherein our new troops would not be confused by any science background!!Their 4th year of college would then be their military service ! You valley girls are next on the list!!

LYNN THE DEVIOUS: WOW, Using only the rich kids,( and preference to Democrat rich kids, since the electorate wants to be ruled by Democrats) will save lots of money.They can donate their salaries back and deduct them as contributions from their trust funds and foundations!! you know, like old but clean underwear and used clothing,in past years!!

JERRY THE MATHEMATICIAN: Since the new Democrat Ways and meanns-committee-chair has promised to slash the military budget, we can probably still manage a small select army,, since the rich might bring their own chefs , wine cellars, their private jets, limos, and PLASTIC SURGEONS, never mind their specially-designed war wardrobes.

MELINDA THE SIMPLE: And in John Kerry motif, (he was in Viet nam, you know,) this New ARMY WOULD REPORT FOR DUTY WITH MOVIE CAMERAS AND TYPEWRITERS .

SUZY THE MINORITY: But diversity? Instead of the present army of "poor blacks and hispanics, struggling to get a leg up", we will have mostly Oriental and INDIAN students , since they are the majority in the universities? oh..you said you'd draft the liberal ARTS students only ---ohhh. THIS MAY WORK.

PORTIA THE PHD :(She was in school with Hillary, you know.) Well, as long as there are hair dressers there. Are there going to be Hairdressers there?

Sara is starting to look forward to the New, better, smarter Army!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOP LAME DUCKS, FUND THE FENCE FIRST!!!!

Posted by Sara Shores on Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:29:02 PM

 SARA  noticed  a couple of weeks ago, before the election,  that the congress quietly passed an immigration fence bill. And quietly,shhhh,  the president signed it, possibly in invisible ink.  However, the gang thinks the lame ducks in the House have work to do for those of us that DID vote for you lamers!!Reasons are given:

HANNAH THE WISE: Many say that the fence is too expensive!! I want to point out that if we consider that all monies will go to enrich our building  material suppliers, our illegals who are presently engaged in construction, our unions, engineers, and security firms!! Work for the boys! This is just as valid a use for our resources as the earmarks you Lame duckers approved for bridges to nowhere, more sen.Byrd highways,and pork pies for every state!!

LYNN THE DEVIOUS :  THE psychological effect : If you build the fence, and people of the USA feel that we have made an effort to SLOW DOWN THE ILLEGAL HORDES, they could reasonably ,then,eventually ,sensibly,...look at regularization or citizenship goals for these mexicans already here, ( many of whom have american citizen babies. Many babies)..NOW, we feel overwhelmed!! Too many!! Too many!!!


JERRY THE MATHEMATICIAN: lame duckers--look at the math!!   Look  at the absolute idiocy of believing that we can deport 30 million illegals, and use little Ellis island immigration centers IN MEXICO  to process them.This latter recomendation by out formerly conservative legislators, makes us wonder, if any of you studied MATH!!Ask Haliburton!! Ask the US MILITARY.They move 150,000.troops in and out of iraq!! JUST that small amount of people moving , is a nightmare of logistics and expense..If you think the FENCE is expensive, try the EXODUS OF those "LAW-BREAKERS!!"  ALSO..GET THE COMPUTER SYSTEM UP, SO EMPLOYERS CAN RUN THOSE FANTASY SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.
ThESE TWO  ITEMS ALONE CAN DAMPEN THE IMMIGRATION FLOW.
 
MELINDA THE SIMPLE: since Mexico'S  Fox DOESN'T LIKE IT, and we are told it hurt republicans with hispanic VOTERS ,( LEGAL? )  THEN WE SHOULD BE HEARTENED THAT THIS FENCE WILL BE AN EFFECTIVE TOOL. Don't forget, Most muslims in this country voted Dmocrat< so the fence will probably be a good security measure, also.

Portia the PHD, (she was in school with Hillary) No fence,-- who will cut my grass???

Sara wants the lame duckers to get revenge, SO__FUND THE FENCE NOW !!By the next election, it will be off of everyone's radar..with the famous AMERICAN NON_attention span.hehe.In 2 years,folks will say "huh, what fence"

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nancy,The most competent, moral, bi-partesan congress? Ever?

Posted by Sara Shores on Tuesday, November 14, 2006 4:15:22 PM
Nancy,The most competent, moral, bi-partesan congress? Ever?

Nancy, Sara doesn't remember, were you the one democrat that even LOOKED at the evidence gathered by the house in the Clinton impeachment.? Did you mention how often Abramoff was in the Clinton white house? Did you object to the Red China Loral gifts of satellite technology? The rental of the Lincoln bedroom? Did you notice Daschle's wife was main lobbyist for the airlines during deregulation? When you just backed Harry Reid, did you know about his million dollar profit on land he doesn't own, or the building of a bridge to enhance property he DOES own across the Arizona border ? HOW about William Jefferson and his $ in the icecube trays? You didn't have the moral mandate to remove him, yet ? ARE we to understand that you suddenly do NOW?

HANNA THE WISE: The fourth highest Dem in the new hierarchy is Patty murray? Not only voted "dimmest bulb in the senate " for 10 years? The wife of a big stevedore union head ? who had no personal reason to deny Darfur the port contract..uhh oh, yes , in the name of "security?" but can't agree we need a "security fence with Mexico?".. Or passports on the border with Canada? Isn't she the person that stated that Bin ladin was beloved for building DAY
care centers in muslim areas controlled by SHARIA?..Under Sharia, littlr girls are not allowed to read or write, reveal their faces in public, or have any say on whom they are going to marry, or at what age? or maybe patty means "madrasahs". where little day care boys are taught total muslim intolerance for jews and christians, and graduate with suicide vests? wow, I'm impressed.The state that gives you Microsoft and BOEING sends you Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray. wow.

LYNN THE DEVIOUS: hehe,.. ANOINTING Dem committee Chairmen that hate Bush, isn't this a SURE way to guarantee the success of bi- partisanship.??

JERRY THE MATHEMATICIAN: Since most of these new Dem wins were by less than 2% of 42% of voters voting, is this a MANDATE?

MELINDA THE SIMPLE:duh. Don't look at what these folks say,look at what they do.they can't help themselves. They ran some pro life candidates, while advertizing against pro-life stances in the majority of races.Go figure.

PORTIA THE PHD:(she was in school with hillary) ..DEMS are just better, because they feel more acutely, and are willing to OVERSEE the stupid unfeeling among us!

Sara wants to know,again, if Hillary was  the co-president, which is what qualifies her for the WHITE HOUSE, isn't SHE term-limited too?! Nancy, look into this?
Sara Shores
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nancy, corruption? Start with the 6 yr U.S. press's JIHAD against Pres. Bush.

Posted by Sara Shores on Saturday, November 11, 2006 2:50:27 PM
 

I Always Have Questions

Commentary with Questions; sometimes I answer my own.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Nancy, corruption? Start with the 6 yr U.S. press's JIHAD against Pres. Bush.

Nancy, Sara is looking forward to your new interest in overseeing corruption!! When president BUSH stole the 2000 election, from the democrat-polls-controlled Broward county in Fla., the press considered issuing a JIHAD on President Bush.It was very simple; Create, Control, Edit , Omit-- THE NEWS!! When BUSH had 90% approval after
911..the Jihad was issued.Let's investigate,..

HANNA THE WISE: when DEMOCRATS lose their birthright of governance, the idea is get back control. In this case, if Bush, a decent intelligent man cannot be destroyed with personal insults about his IQ, his dubious religious attachment, his blundering mis-speaks, (so offensive to the "intellectuals",) then they planned to destroy the WAR....while "supporting the troops, just not their commander" ..... As soon as this Jihad was declared, FORMER presidents set out to travel internationally to destroy Bush, and whip up anti-americanism, to increase world anger with us. Their frustration with lack of power must be satisfied at the risk of the safety of the United States, if necessary. It worked in viet nam, it would work again!! The libs extended the war there, and have wrecked our momentum in IRAQ, .They are responsible , now as then, for increasing AMERICAN soldier deaths, by encouaging this ENEMY.

LYNN THE DEVIOUS: I remember the Clinton years, a photo op every day in every newspaper. The white house war room sent out daily position papers. Every sunday, the press regaled us with more pix of Clinton ( the first black president) outside some church, clutching his bible! (wink-wink-yuh know ah don mean ut, hu,hu). BUT No pix of Bush, a believer, actually going to church, as that could shore up his base. Can't have that.

JERRY THE MATHEMATICIAN: Re the OMIT section of the JIHAD--Omit any good war news--run those tortue pix by the only evil doers in the world , Americans. (BUSH BAD) Don't run the beheading films of NICK BERG, Eugene Armstrong, or graphic films of 9-11.(Bush might be RIGHT about danger of this enemy.) -Put good economic news at the back of the financial pages, "economy only up 1.1% ..how disappointing" ..contrast the clinton days :--"wow fabulous , economy up another 1.1% "
    Count the times Clinton's endless speeches were dumped on us. Was he ever faced , even once, with the hostile speeches, and articles against him by FORMER presidents, and their ENTIRE cabinets( Madeleine Albright, Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, Ramsey clark,: they NEVER went away!! Bush has given some spectacular speeches. The press runs one paragraph of his speech, then offers 20 paragraphs with diatribes by the democrat opposition to it. Any time for the president means equal time for any lib with a big mouth, no matter how offensive. Civility?
 DAY in and day out, Clinton didn't get this abrasive press treatment., and , as per his recent FOX-tv outburst, he couldn't have withstood it--- 3 lines of criticism from the ABC series --on the "road to 911"and POW!
DID the Press ever ask him or mrs. president clinton .. how many times Jack ABramoff visited the CLINTON white house??? Nancy, where are you?? CORRUPTION HERE?

MELINDA THE SIMPLE: re the EDIT-OUT portion of the JIHAD: Clinton's sexual pecadillos ?--, well, that's just his personal life, "Everyone lies about sex" and Ken Starr was a "pervert" to look into those little sins. Does this whitewash apply to the  press recounting EVERY word of every e-mail by Foley? Who is really obsessed with sex?-- oh oh. President Bush's approval rating going up??..oops, time to run another picture from Abu Ghraib, or OUT another republican gay,..well- We thought gay was good, guys.

PORTIA THE PHD: I can't wait to get Hillary in the white house. The press will be so nice!!

Sara wants to know, if Hillary was co-president, which is what qualifies her for the WHITE HOUSE, isn't SHE term-limited too?! Nancy, look into this?

Sara Shores
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nancy, WHERE HAS ALL THE VOTER FRAUD GONE?

Posted by Sara Shores on Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:44:14 PM
 

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Nancy, WHERE HAS ALL THE VOTER FRAUD GONE?

Nancy, Where has all the voter fraud gone? Sara is stunned! Almost all the republican losses were 2-3%. And-- ACORN ,the big activist dem group has charges of voter fraud , in several states, (as many as 30,000 illegal registrations in one city alone!!) No republican screams, shouts, yells, etc.??

HANNA THE WISE: when DEMOCRATS lose, the election was, well, "STOLEN". BUT if you notice, the dems tell us what DEMS are doing, when they accuse US of nefarious activities, (which they know about because they have just done it,themselves.). Every time, we are charged, we should have an investigation into their having done that activity. But no, we are too nice!! We just quietly go away.

LYNN THE DEVIOUS: aha! THAT'S WHY THE INDEPENDENTS VOTED DEMOCRAT. They couldn't FACE another 2 years of the tirades, temper tantrums, accusations of fraud etc. associated with DEM losses. Whew, it's over.

JERRY THE MATHEMATICIAN: Americans have just under a 5 year attention span. They don't remember how they felt on 9-11, they don't remmmmmember the shame of the soiled rug in the oval office, the security leaks by sen.Leahy, the TED kennedy water boarding of the young lady under the bridge, the male prostitue ring in Barney Frank's abode, or the look of our viet nam vets when they returned home ,when dems and libs spit on them. These latter 3 will be committee chairman in the new morals perfect congress...where were the moral assessments on these dems at the poles? Yes, that's right, no-one expects libs to be moral! DUH.

MELINDA THE SIMPLE: HOW CAN THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE LAWS PASS OVERWHELMINGLY , AND DEMS GET ELECTED BY THE SAME ELECTORATE? The real fraud was dems running as pro life, and people believing that! wow.

Sara wants to think it was not the hispanic voters that made the difference.??sigh!!

Sarah Shores

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

who actually bought Hillary's book

Posted by Sara Shores on Friday, November 03, 2006 2:28:35 PM
 

so, who actually bought/read hillary's clinton's autobio? i spend hours at thrift stores, st vincent de pauls, salvation army, goodwill. I look for trashy mystery paperbooks that can drown in the bath tub,w/o guilt!! well..i never have seen a copy of the "living history" bio of hillary,( nor even bill's.)-- and i have seen rush's books, even an old hospital romance by michael medved, i wondered,--i asked my "franz"..and i got SOME responses:

HANNAH THE WISE SAYS: Hillary's publisher S&S claimed 2.5 million in sales,but in 2003, nielsen bookscan said 1.5 million..hmmmm. Conservatives buy more books than libs,because many DEMOCRAT constituencies are not literate ! BUT, it is possible then, that these huge tomes were purchased OR WON IN blue state lotteries and are being UTILIZED as household furnishings, end tables, high chair boosters, etc.

LYNN THE DEVIOUS: Remember jim wright ? his book was bought up by the unions and the still-cartoned editions were secreted away in storage bins. Perhaps Soros , move on .org and the clinton library purchased these books and they are squirreled away,--collectibles as they are, in safe deposit boxes and bank vaults to await an increase in value? BEST CONSPIRACY GUESS: believe they are buried in cement, next to jimmy hoffa's body in the end zone of a football field near you.

JERRY THE MATHMATICIAN:DID simon & shuster ACTUALLY PRINT THEM? OR WAS IT LIKE THAT FUTURES STOCK MARKET DEAL, where $1000.OO turned into $100,000.00 IN 2 STOCK SALES IN JUST A WEEK?--AT THAT RATE 15,000.BOOKS COULD TURN INTO 1,500,000.BOOKS.! WHAT DID NIELSEN BOOKSCAN SAY?and when did they know it??

MELINDA THE SIMPLE: why would hillary even write a book about 8 years with Bill?

PORTIA THE PHD :IT'S THE VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACy!!

sara feels confused, and has still never seen this book.sigh. sara shores.

posted by Sarah Shores  

Thursday, November

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rush right/ambose/b.press wrong

Posted by Sara Shores on Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:49:56 PM
 

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

rush is right/press & ambrose wrong/and why

well--had bill press and jay ambrose heard- limbaugh's show they would have heard him making some points they could have used..-starting with the democrat's 2004 promise that if THEY were elected, "superman would walk"- -( john edwards 2004 vp candidate.) etc. remember.?? limbaugh's point..it is cruel to promise sick people cures that are not in the offing even if " only they vote democrat. " DID you know???----amendment 2- is a constitutional cloning law., not an embryonic stem cell law.--MJF (michael j fox) said sun. night..he hadn't EVEN read the prop he was backing.(STEPHANOPOLOS) ..the ambrose/press contingent says repeatedly "stem cell research!"! we know they know this: All republicans support adult and umbilical cord stem cell research. Bush was the FIRST president to fund stem cell research. EMbryonic stem cells are the only debatable form of research that republicans do not want GOVernment dollars to support. If this research is so promising, where is the private money? the Gates foundation, the clinton library? international funds? the greedy pharaceuticals? ALSO, as a former actor, i saw a commercial Fox did 6 months ago for parkinson's, for this PSA---he was fine, they let the camera do the shaking, sp effects, etc.
MJF not political ? REMEMBER fox campaigned for john kerry ..(2004)-"not political?" (mjf said he was NOT political on a tv interview with katie couric this week) but--these ads are run only against republicans, (and the only candidate who voted against funding for stem cells was one of the DEMOCRATS that michael j fox IS supporting with these ads. AND Ads were sponsered by democrat party... with democrat $.---if MJF was not being political, why not just run the PSA's ? if MJF was having a seizure during filming of these spots, and the film crew/ democrat- paid producer/ didn't want to run it, they would have reshot!!..so the democratic machine has waltzed out another" infallible" victim..as ANN coulter pointed out. Too bad the guys don't listen to limbaugh .---(his average audience has a college education) or HUGH, SHAWN, lapin, etc. AND__MJF's OWN foundation is funding GENETIC altering , which is where the most recent promises for parkinson's are emanating. So, I can't agree that when these "victims"" enter politics they get a pass.--- Not counting the lies in the ad about republican non- support of stem cell research, and the mis-representation of the amendment on cloning--.so MJF threw his hat into politics, not parkinson's research.AND REPUBLICANS GET TO RESPOND.
---- sara just wonders sometimes!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

john kerry's JOKE:my friends explain:

Posted by Sara Shores on Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:30:44 PM
 /hi!- Well..my friends responded , to explain the john kerry joke to me....Here goes:

Lynn THE DEVIOUS:--Kerry is the Democrat's Oct. surprise to themselves. Dems have been predicting SWEEP of both houses for months!! IF it doesn't happen, they now have a great excuse, blaming a disposable non-candidate for missing their golden goal!!..And hillary concurs.hehe

Hanna the WISE: KERRY WAS IN VIET NAM FOR 3 MONTHS,(with typewriter and movie camera in tiny boat,) WON 5 TOP DECORATIONS, WALKED OUT on his legs, ,unprecedented accomplishments, where he was the ONLY college grad with a bunch of dumb drafted grunts-- STRAIGHT INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL testimony, became a super star..relives it every day! Even this week!! VOILA! Winter soldier syndrome.

JERRY THE OBTUSE: UH, ..KERRY SAID THE JOKE WAS ABOUT THE STUPIDITY/LACK OF STUDY ETC OF THE PRESIDENT AND WHITEHOUSE, ..not THE TROOPS !! AND that the white house "KNEW" that is what kerry said/meant.--but if they are soooo dumb, i e bush et al....aren't they ALSO too dumb to figure out Kerry's joke??

and__ Melinda THE SIMPLETON: --KERRY LIED.

Sara still hates feeling stupid..but bush's college grades were better than kerry's, and sara's college grades were better that bush's.oh well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »